Making the Case
A cinematic, chapter-by-chapter narrative — from debate stage to doorstep to courtroom.
Before I became a lawyer, I learned to make an argument.
At 17, I traveled to Washington, D.C., to attend Howard University’s inaugural National High School Forensics Academy and Tournament. The experience introduced me to rigorous research, competitive debate and the power of a well-constructed argument.
I won the competition and received a scholarship to Howard. More importantly, I found an early version of my voice.
That first trip to Howard did more than help determine where I would attend college. It showed me that preparation could turn conviction into influence.
The case began with finding my voice.
Before the courtroom, there were doorsteps.
In 2008, I volunteered in support of Barack Obama’s presidential campaign, canvassing voters door to door in Virginia. I later traveled to Denver for the Democratic National Convention and stood among the crowds in Washington for President Obama’s inauguration.
My fifth-grade teacher had cast her first presidential vote for George McGovern. Years later, she encouraged me to become involved in the Obama campaign. At the convention in Denver, I met McGovern himself — a small, improbable full-circle moment inside a much larger piece of history.
That campaign taught me that change is not created solely by the person standing on the stage. It is built by ordinary people willing to have one more conversation and knock on one more door.
A few of the people I crossed paths with along the way — appearing in a photo together isn't an endorsement.
Then the argument became personal.
A few years after the Obama campaign, I became an organizer with Vote for Equality at the Los Angeles Gay & Lesbian Center. I recruited and trained volunteers, then joined them in neighborhoods to speak directly with voters about marriage equality.
As a Black queer woman, the issue was not abstract. We were asking strangers to reconsider whether people like us were entitled to equal recognition under the law.
The work required conviction, but it also required listening: finding the human concern beneath someone’s political position without minimizing what was at stake.
Long before advocacy became my profession, it had become part of who I was.
Before I represented clients, I was learning how to advocate at the door.
The story moved in front of the camera.
In 2011, audiences met me during the second season of Showtime’s The Real L Word. The program captured a real but limited chapter of my life: newly out, falling in love, finding community and working for marriage equality.
Reality television is a kind of edited memoir. The events may be real, but framing determines which version of a person the audience receives.
Living in public taught me how profoundly editing, context and narrative affect who is understood, who is believed and what people remember. That lesson eventually influenced my desire to move behind the camera and tell stories with greater authorship.
A real chapter is not the whole story.
I learned the rules — and kept making the case.
At La Verne Law, advocacy became both discipline and craft. I served as Student Bar Association president, interned in the San Bernardino Superior Court and represented the school in the Frederick Douglass Moot Court Competition.
My teammate Earl Robertson III and I earned Best Team and Best Brief in the Western Region. At nationals, our written advocacy earned Best Brief.
The work brought together the skills I had been developing since I was 17: research the record, understand the audience, write with precision and stand behind the argument.
Power also speaks through numbers.
I entered law school imagining a career in entertainment. Then a federal income tax course showed me another language of power.
Tax brought together the subjects that had always interested me: policy, business and law. I pursued a Tax LL.M. at Loyola Law School, received First Honors in Accounting for Lawyers and began my professional tax career in PwC’s financial-services practice. I later continued that work at KPMG.
The experience taught me to look beneath a transaction or institution and ask the questions that structure power: Who owns the value? Who carries the risk? Who receives the benefit? And who wrote the rules?
The technical foundation eventually brought me back to the industry I had imagined from the beginning.
Follow the law. Follow the structure. Follow the money.
Then tax brought me inside entertainment.
Entertainment had always been part of the plan. Tax gave me an unexpected way inside.
At Netflix, I worked as a Senior Tax Analyst from November 2019 to October 2021, during a period when streaming was reshaping how entertainment was financed, distributed and consumed. I later joined Warner Bros. Discovery as a Tax Manager, from March 2023 to January 2025, working within a company that brought together a century of studio history, global brands and a rapidly changing media business.
The roles allowed me to see entertainment from a perspective most audiences never encounter: not simply as content, celebrity or culture, but as a complex business built through corporate structures, financial decisions, intellectual property and calculated risk.
Years earlier, I had experienced entertainment from in front of the camera. At Netflix and Warner Bros. Discovery, I came to understand more of the business operating behind it.
Those experiences now inform how I approach entertainment law, entrepreneurship and original media: with respect for both the story being told and the structure determining who owns it.
Working inside major institutions taught me how sophisticated systems allocate opportunity, value and power. Litigation returned those questions to their most human scale.
I learned entertainment in front of the camera, inside the institution and now behind the lens.
Eventually, the work returned to people.
After years working across tax, finance and entertainment institutions, I moved into civil litigation and began representing people confronting injury, loss and systems designed to resist accountability.
The transition was not a departure from everything that came before. Litigation brought those earlier chapters together: factual investigation, financial analysis, strategic communication, public narrative and the responsibility to stand beside someone when the stakes are personal.
Now, the institution is mine to build.
Today, I am building Sajdah D. Golde Law Corporation and serving clients through The Golde Firm — a practice grounded in a principle that has followed me from debate tournaments to doorsteps, corporate institutions and courtrooms: Advocacy first.
I am also returning to entertainment with greater authorship. Through original media and projects such as The Cue and GoldeLaw.tv, I am developing stories rooted in law, Los Angeles and the lives institutions too often overlook.
I began as someone being documented. I later learned the business behind the screen. Now, I am holding the camera and building the structure for myself.
I’ve spent my life making the case. Now I’m building the platform.